About Me
I had two strokes – December 2008 (my arm) and March 2009 (my leg, mouth and arm). My daughter’s are Steffi – 19 and Lily – 10. Steffi’s site is Crowned Meadow. Look me up on my facebook profile and add me!!!!!
Blog FeedBurner Feed
Posts CommentsRecent Comments
- John Bennett on Azaria inquest would hear of new attacks
- John Bennett on About Me
- John B on About Me
- Joe Goldstone on About Me
- Kb1951 on Azaria inquest would hear of new attacks
Archives
My WorldBig Fish Games
Australian Blogs
Blogroll
Good Sites
Meta
Another Title…
[...] I saw this really good post today and wanted to link to it [...]…
Hi Doreen, thanks for getting touch, where are you? I the USA I guess, I am in Manchester UK. I have left f/b now as I fed up with it. I am on email, Twitter and Skype and mobile of course, and I am also happy to chat to you
“But how did the dingo rip Azaria from a bassinet in her family’s tent and drag her over the sand,”
Most likely using its mouth. The dingo society witness produced photographs of a dingo enveloping the head of a baby sized doll in its jaws to carry it around. If a dingo can carry a kangaroo it is strong enough to carry a baby without dragging and the aboriginal tracker observed a mark along the track where an indentation in the sand had a weaved pattern. That was believed to be where it temporarily put down the baby.
“then remove her body from her buttoned jumpsuit and turn the singlet, which was inside the jumpsuit, inside out?”
was outside the jumpsuit and the jas undonemichaellll. He ga
There is no reason to think that a dingo did that. It is irrelevant to all the evidence from all the witnesses and the blood and dingo footprints centimetres from Azaria’s cot that screams that a dingo took Azaria.
Even when the witness found the jumpsuit nappy and singlet the singlet ve evidence that the clothes were naturally scattered and it didn’t look artificial. If the dingo had removed the baby it would make sense that the singlet would be inside out. Since the first police officer photographed it with the singlet inside and gave evidence that he only picked up the garments to check them for human remains and then put them back as he found them rather than interfering with them it must have happened in between when the first witness found them and the police officer photographed them. There is no reason to think the dingo still had any interest or involvement at that time.
“And then leave the baby’s matinee jacket, which was found six years later 153m away, without opening the top button?”
Given the mysterious human intervention with the singlet after the dingo had well and truly left it alone why assume that the same thing didn’t happen with the matinee jacket?
Expand “But how did the dingo rip Azaria from a bassinet in her family’s tent and drag her over the sand,”Most likely using its mouth. The dingo society witness produced photographs of a dingo enveloping the head of a baby sized doll in its jaws to carry it around. If a dingo can carry a kangaroo it is strong enough to carry a baby without dragging and the aboriginal tracker observed a mark along the track where an indentation in the sand had a weaved pattern. That was believed to be where it temporarily put down the baby.”then remove her body from her buttoned jumpsuit and turn the singlet, which was inside the jumpsuit, inside out?”
There is no reason to think that a dingo did that. It is irrelevant to all the evidence indicating that the dingo took the baby. That included witnesses and the blood and dingo footprints centimetres from Azaria’s cot.
Even when the witness found the jumpsuit nappy and singlet the singlet he gave evidence that the singlet was outside the jumpsuit, and that the clothes were naturally scattered and it didn’t look artificial. If the dingo had removed the baby it would make sense that the singlet would be inside out. The first police officer photographed it with the singlet inside and gave evidence that he only picked up the garments to check them for human remains and then put them back as he found them rather than interfering with them. There is no reason to think the dingo still had any interest or involvement after its initial discovery which is when that interference must have occurred. It happened between the discovery and the photographing.”And then leave the baby’s matinee jacket, which was found six years later 153m away, without opening the top button?”Given the mysterious human intervention with the singlet after the dingo had well and truly left it alone why assume that the same thing didn’t happen with the matinee jacket?